Sylvanna Devlin

Yes I know it sound sexual, and with my suggestion that could prove interesting . But pretty frightening to the eyes!

Here’s the idea. Animations has/is getting to the point getting maths to move it is getting easier – albeit done by a computer. Get the dimensions or whatever wrong, and whoops, please retake Calculus.

Why on earth can’t we teach most of calculus by getting a computer to show what works and what doesn’t? Maybe more, I’d have to really think about how to visually represent more than geometry but now I’m interested. Which means I should actually read my Dads (as in he wrote them) Book.

The point I really have is that we don’t need a whole game to screw around with maths. How fun would it be to experiment? No plot, no quest, certainly no NPC just a runner.

I imagine a few good potential 3d modelers would emerge and they go further. But it shouldn’t fucking be made to be a requirement. I never even read most of my papers after turning them in so why can’t we just have snippets of motion that we may still never use but would be better for understanding it at all – maybe craft some future Cybersecurity engineers.

I imagine (Again) that it would be interesting to make the computer choke on crafting a shape but potentially hilarious as long as coded to handle a feedback of, “Huh? The symbol seems to be in the wrong order.”

How cool would that be?