If there’s no narrative involved.
Theoretically – if part of the hacking GUI
The abuse system could hack everything. Including digital records of therapeutic and psychiatric medical records.
And use a formula to produce voices that then know enough to phish and learn more.
Then use whatever dating-like conversational AI to drive someone insane.
On a room by room basis.
As long as there’s audio equipment installed.
A long, long, time ago a Woman designed this system as a proof of concept way back in Petaluma. But it had to work and I was the test subject.
Eventually men took pity on me after a suicide attempt to stop it.
Some acted with compassion before. They were directed to lure me in and break my heart. But the sheer length and depth of involvement required lured us to each other.
People are still people.
And this took too long.
We all began to care.
It was messy.
Now she’ll use a Dating AI.
Because she doesn’t have that problem.
And the problem with the idea there are now no male terrorists in this particular organization is there may no longer be pauses.
Because of the observable detail women are more relentless and some are arguably more vicious.
Martial art fights see men pause and size each other up. But fights with women are fast and don’t pause. They learn as they go until one is incapacitated.
We might not see an end to this till the correct Ranna is stopped. Who is not an Indian woman organizing a cult.
It’s the cover name of someone with a distinctly New Jersey accent who lived on king road when I did.
Now terrorists always want something.
And according to the cry of one it’s unchanged from Petaluma.
They want control
Of?
Everything.
It sounds like a game, because it should be the stuff of fiction. A noticeable illuminati they swear will be more compassionate.
After breaking a few eggs.
Because while lethal now, the initial goal was abuse, conditioning, and corralling the victims into subjects.
My PTSD is excruciating.
But she viewed her way as compassionate and never listened to me that it was lethal.
It was horrific for me but I was her worst nightmare.
Wild, creative, good natured and free.
P.S.
As for a “what’s wrong with having women as sole leaders”?
Until women are socialized not to play stupid, not to control through reactive abuse and gaslighting, not to get catty and tear others down instead of build up, not to let jealousy consume them?
In what way would that be better?
Women are still dragging others into whoring and slavery. Consumerists still view people as commodities not people. Rich women are often shallow and vapid because they just had to flitter an eyelid from the right background.
Any woman who had to work her way into power had to work for it and knows the value of actual equality. And it is hard. But flipping the coin entirely over won’t stop women who lie, cheat, and steal.
And if this is a proof of concept of the way women view power and control?
No thank you.
They’d probably do this to a woman politician if they couldn’t sink their claws in.
